India’s Markets Regulator Is Now Watching What You Watch Before You Trade
Team Sahi
Over the past few years, retail participation in India’s derivatives market has exploded.
Much of this surge didn’t come from broker reports or analyst notes it came from Instagram reels, Telegram channels, and YouTube livestreams that turned complex instruments like weekly options into something that looked like a side hustle.
SEBI has now decided to intervene not in the trades themselves, but in the content ecosystem that influences them.
The regulator recently deployed an internal AI surveillance system called Sudarshan, built specifically to identify misleading financial content posted by unregistered finfluencers across social media platforms.
In its initial phase alone, the system has already facilitated the removal of more than 1.2 lakh posts that were found to be potentially deceptive or in violation of advisory norms.
This marks a significant shift in how market regulation is evolving in India.
Traditionally, regulatory monitoring has focused on transactions abnormal volumes, price manipulation, insider trading patterns.
But the retail derivatives boom post-COVID introduced a new variable: influence.
A large number of first-time traders began entering leveraged positions not through research reports, but through short-form educational content that increasingly blurred the line between financial literacy and actionable investment advice.
Under SEBI regulations, only registered entities such as Research Analysts or Investment Advisers are permitted to issue trade recommendations. While general market education is allowed, the moment a content creator starts sharing position-specific calls ,especially in leveraged instruments like options ; they move into a regulated space.
Sudarshan has been designed to detect precisely this distinction.
The AI scans multilingual audio, video, and text content across platforms to flag claims that may mislead investors such as guaranteed profits, backtested performance screenshots without disclosures, or subscription-based trading calls presented as education.
Once identified, SEBI works with the respective platforms to initiate takedown requests.
SEBI’s repeated data releases have highlighted a structural reality: a significant majority of retail participants in the F&O segment incur net losses over time.
Yet derivatives trading online has often been framed as a scalable income stream rather than a probabilistic risk-taking activity.
This mismatch between perceived and actual risk has behavioural consequences.
When large groups of inexperienced traders crowd into weekly expiry trades based on viral setups, it doesn’t just affect individual P&Ls it can distort short-term liquidity and strike-wise positioning across the market.
By targeting misleading trade narratives instead of restricting access to derivatives themselves, SEBI appears to be attempting a more calibrated intervention: improving decision quality without stifling participation.
The deployment of Sudarshan suggests that regulatory scrutiny is moving upstream toward the information channels that shape trading behaviour.
Unregistered signal groups and monetized trade-call ecosystems are likely to face greater oversight.
At the same time, creators offering genuine educational content may need to more clearly separate learning material from actionable strategy recommendations.
For active retail traders especially those building short-duration options strategies this could gradually improve the signal-to-noise ratio across trading communities.
In markets where information travels faster than price, it seems regulation is now trying to keep up at the same speed.
Related